Firecrawl vs Supabase MCP Server
Firecrawl scores higher overall: 80/100 (A-tier) vs 76/100 (A-tier) for Supabase MCP Server in MCP servers & agent tools. Firecrawl leads on job fit, ease and momentum. Supabase MCP Server leads on value, openness & portability and trust & maturity. They tie on builder/gamer bonus.
Scores are initial editorial estimates from public information, not hands-on tests. How we score →
Side by side
| Firecrawl | Supabase MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A | A |
| Overall score | 80/100 | 76/100 |
| Job fit | 20/30 | 16/30 |
| Ease / time-to-first-result | 14/15 | 13/15 |
| Value | 12/15 | 14/15 |
| Momentum | 13/15 | 10/15 |
| Openness & portability | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Trust & maturity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Builder/gamer bonus | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| What it does | API and open-source crawler that scrapes and converts websites to clean markdown, with an MCP server. | Official MCP server for querying databases, managing tables, and running migrations in Supabase. |
| Best for | Your agent needs clean web content. | Your app runs on Supabase and you build with agents. |
| Skip it if | You only scrape a single simple page. | You are wary of giving agents database write access. |
| Pricing | Free plan (1,000 credits/mo); Hobby $16/mo billed annually; Standard $83/mo annually ✓ verified on the official pricing page, Oct 18, 2026 | Free and open source; Supabase usage billed separately unverified editorial summary, not yet confirmed on an official pricing page |
| Starting paid price | $16/mo (billed annually) | Not recorded |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes (unverified) |
| Platforms | API · MCP | MCP |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Official site | firecrawl.dev | github.com |
| Last reviewed | Oct 18, 2026 | Oct 18, 2026 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Firecrawl if…
Your agent needs clean web content.
Pick Supabase MCP Server if…
Your app runs on Supabase and you build with agents.
FAQ
Is Firecrawl better than Supabase MCP Server?
Firecrawl scores higher overall: 80/100 (A-tier) vs 76/100 (A-tier) for Supabase MCP Server in MCP servers & agent tools. Firecrawl leads on job fit, ease and momentum. Supabase MCP Server leads on value, openness & portability and trust & maturity. They tie on builder/gamer bonus. The better pick depends on the job: choose Firecrawl if your agent needs clean web content. Choose Supabase MCP Server if your app runs on Supabase and you build with agents.
Do Firecrawl and Supabase MCP Server have free tiers?
Firecrawl: free tier listed (verified on the official pricing page Oct 18, 2026). Supabase MCP Server: free tier listed (unverified). Unverified means an editorial summary not yet confirmed on the vendor's pricing page.
Is Firecrawl or Supabase MCP Server open source?
Firecrawl is listed as open source; Supabase MCP Server is listed as open source.
How are these scores calculated?
Both tools are scored out of 100 on the same public rubric (job fit 30, ease 15, value 15, momentum 15, openness 10, trust 10, builder/gamer bonus 5) within their category. Current scores are initial editorial estimates from public information, not hands-on tests. Sponsors cannot buy points.
Keep exploring
- Firecrawl review and score breakdown
- Supabase MCP Server review and score breakdown
- Best MCP servers and agent tools
- Best MCP servers for developers
- MCP servers & agent tools tier list